Arizona DUI Field Sobriety Tests

In Arizona DUI Cases, You have the ability to Refuse field sobriety testing

 

THE ROADSIDE TESTS REQUIRE YOUR COOPERATION AND SHOULD BE REFUSED

 

Want to help the police officer build a DUI case against you? If so, take their tests in ignorance. Want the real truth? Then protect yourself and read on.

 

"Field sobriety testing" (or FSTs) as practiced on the city streets and highways of Arizona is not an effective indication of a person's level of intoxication. There are no conclusive studies linking the results of any field test to legal intoxication. The best studies show less than an 80% rate of accuracy.

 

Only three of the tests available to officers have been given any shroud of "scientific" legitimacy by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). These tests are:

 

The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test ("The Eye Test")

The Walk and Turn Test

The One Leg Stand Test

 

All other tests are not validated in any official way. In fact, many of the tests involve closing your eyes and balancing. Without a visual frame of reference, no "balance" test can honestly claim to measure sobriety or intoxication.

 

Therefore, tests such as the Finger to Nose Test, and the Rhomberg Balance Test should be avoided.

 

Other tests, such as counting or saying the ABCs backwards, counting your fingers, or playing "pattycake" have no correlation whatsoever to ones ability to operate a motor vehicle safely.

 

Officers regularly testify that FSTs are gauged to measure "divided attention." For instance, when you drive, you must divide your attention between several tasks, such as steering, breathing, navigating and signaling. The theory is that alcohol impair one's ability to divide attention.

 

You have the absolute ability to refuse to submit to field sobriety testing. If you decide to take the tests, the officer cast his/her own interpretation of your performance on your case. Keep in mind that the officer is already investigating you for DUI, and in all likelihood will arrest you even if you take the FSTs.

 

THE DRAWBACKS OF REFUSING THE TESTS:

 

Contrary to common misunderstanding, refusing the submit to field testing will not result in the suspension of your driving privileges.

The biggest drawback of refusing these tests is that the prosecutor will argue that you refused out of a "consciousness of guilt." The prosecutor will try to make the Jury believe that you didn't take the tests because you knew you were drunk and would fail them.

 

There is case law in Arizona that states that admitting the fact that you refused to take field sobriety tests during your arrest is admissible in court as it doesn't violate your Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination and to have an attorney present prior to questioning.

 

The other major drawback to refusing field testing is that the officer will probably arrest you right away. Usually, this just speeds up the inevitable. The officer might also threaten that if you don't take the tests, you will be booked into jail. If threatened, generally it is okay to do them, just let the officer know that you are cooperating out of respect for him/her and politeness, and that you are doing so under protest. That way, your DUI attorney can later make a motion to suppress the tests because they lacked your voluntary consent.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

As a general rule subject to very few exceptions, I recommend that you politely refuse to take the tests.

 

 

Consultation

I want to personally invite you to contact me to discuss your Arizona DUI case. There is never any obligation, and most people tell me how much better and more secure they feel after we meet to discuss the options. Call me or fill out my consultation request form.

Arizona DUI Attorney Consultation

I look forward to talking with you.

AZ DUI Lawyer Stewart Bergman's Signature

Testimonials

"Stewart Bergman did an excellent job representing me in my case. He was attentive to my concerns and a superb listener. Many lawyers will disregard ideas and opinions of their clients beyond the basic facts of the case. Mr. Bergman was quite the opposite and integrated my input into the defense strategy. While my case was surely not the biggest he had, he put the necessary time and thought into it. Ultimately, Mr. Bergman made an appeal to the judge and was successful in getting the charges dropped, which other attorneys had assured me was not possible. Mr. Bergman’s effort and interest in my case made me feel less like a paycheck and more like a valued friend."

Read More Testimonials

TRUSTe online privacy certificationMcAfee Secure sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams